It does get things wrong ("quantum" is not a magic wand), but in the sense that you treat the quantum stuff as mathematical ideas and not something that would b

It does get things wrong ("quantum" is not a magic wand), but in the sense that you treat the quantum stuff as mathematical ideas and not something that would be practical, it's pretty good. An in, it's the best that I know to exist. It's not "realistic", because they need to keep AI development confined for story reasons, and I don't think what they do with black holes really makes sense, but most of the individual "objects" or "processes" are pulled directly from physics or computer science papers. The book's kind of a museum or zoo like experience, because the author needs to keep these things unrealistically separate in order to show them off how he wants to, but it's not generally gibberish. It just wouldn't work in real life. Edit: or do you mean you personally don't like it because the world isn't solid enough? (generally unchanging, a good base for a story) If so, I agree.