4 ms·
>They never had any value They had immense value in ancient world. They were valued much more than gold - due to their rarity. Southern India was the only know
by murukesh_s 2y ago
>They never had any value
They had immense value in ancient world. They were valued much more than gold - due to their rarity. Southern India was the only known source for mining diamonds in ancient world [1]. They were used as currency and was valued higher than gold. In fact there were wars fought for diamonds.
There is a saying about Koh-i-Noor, one of the most famous Diamond - "If a strong man were to throw four stones – one north, one south, one east, one west, and a fifth stone up into the air – and if the space between them were to be filled with gold, all would not equal the value of the Koh-i-Noor" [2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golconda_diamonds https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golconda_diamonds
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/16/koh-i-noor-diamond-britain-illegally-india-pakistan-afghanistan-history-tower https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/16/koh-i-...
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mr_toad 2y agoGood quality sapphires, rubies and emeralds are rarer and in some parts of history were considered more valuable. They’re not hyped to the extent that diamonds have been in the last 100 years.
- myrmidon 2y agoThe 5 stone gold comparison is utter BS (unless those 5 stones are like 5 stones heavy :P). All the gold available to humans on earth right now fits into a ~20m cube, and that is most certainly worth orders of magnitude more than a single diamond in a historical artifact.
- murukesh_s 2y agoNot at that time when the diamonds were mined only from one mine in the entire world for several hundreds of thousands of years.