3 ms·

vi: 1976 GNU Emacs : 1984 BIND: 1986 are (along with too many other projects) from way before Nov 1993, where "The Total Growth of Open Source" graph starts fr

• schacon 2y ago
  It all depends on how you're counting. For one, "open source" was not a phrase before 1998, so there is some retrofitting of Free Software projects. But also, there isn't a registry, it's rather difficult to be more than approximate with this. The article is very specific about their methodology, I'm only using one graph as a general example.
  • amtamt 2y ago
    From the paper > "The database contains data from January 1990 until May 2007. Of this time horizon, we analyze the time frame from January 1995 to December 2006. We omit data before 1995 because it is too sparse to be useful" > "Large distributions like Debian are counted as one project. Popular projects such as GNU Emacs are counted as projects of their own, little known or obsolete packages such as the Zoo archive utility are ignored" So even though methodology is "very specific", it seems very incomplete/ inaccurate/ selective. Even Linux kernel, as per their source, started in 2005 (https://openhub.net/p/linux https://openhub.net/p/linux). Source: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45813632_The_Total_Growth_of_Open_Source/download https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45813632_The_Total_...