4 ms·

I mean, that's just when they did it fairly deliberately. Regardless, I think you would be hard pressed to argue SF was a great hosting environment when Google

I mean, that's just when they did it fairly deliberately. Regardless, I think you would be hard pressed to argue SF was a great hosting environment when Google Code launched, which was the point.

BSDobelix 2y ago
>hard pressed to argue SF was a great hosting environment when Google Code launched But SF had FTP, Websites, SVN hosting and i think even a WIKI, so you can hardly compare it with Google-Code...and hey at least they opensource'd their "forge": https://allura.apache.org/ https://allura.apache.org/ IDK i don't have such bad memory's about SF, even today you serve big files over SF because of GH limits.
- ndiddy 2y ago
  SourceForge was originally open source, but they later closed it. GNU Savannah (https://savannah.gnu.org/ https://savannah.gnu.org/) runs on a fork of the last open version of SourceForge.
  - BSDobelix 2y ago
    >SourceForge was originally open source True after slashdot got buy'd, they also served malware AFTER the takeover (2013), and now look at that year: Allura graduated from incubation with the Apache Software Foundation in March >>2013 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Allura https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Allura Google-Code was in 2006 right?