4 ms·
> The Ocean Cleanup’s operations demonstrate that the elimination of the GPGP can be done at today’s level of performance in 10 years at a cost of $7.5bn > Dat
by bArray 2y ago
> The Ocean Cleanup’s operations demonstrate that the elimination of the GPGP can be done at today’s level of performance in 10 years at a cost of $7.5bn
> Data and modelling indicate that the removal of the GPGP could be achieved in 5 years at a cost of $4bn
10 years at $7.5bn or 5 years at $4bn? I'll take 2.5 years at $2.5bn. That kind of tells me that there are enormous labour costs.
What I really want to know is what they are doing with it once collected.
> Ocean plastic pollution is one of the most urgent problems our oceans face today, costing the world up to $2.5 trillion per year in damage to economies, industries, and the environment
I'd like to see a breakdown of that. My suspicion is that this random floating patch of rubbish hardly affects economies or industries at all.
> To put the cost of clean oceans in context, the annual spend in the US on Halloween decorations is $10.6bn USD; US pet food spending in 2024 was $66.9bn USD; the combined net worth of the top 10 richest people is $1.66tn USD, and 1% of the annual net profits of the world’s plastic producers is $7.2bn USD.
What has the predicted worth (that is mostly non-liquid) of the top 10 richest people got to do with anything?
I did think "why not just scoop it up into a retrofitted ship and take it away?". The following seems interesting [1]:
> Despite the common public perception of the patch existing as giant islands of floating garbage, its low density (4 particles per cubic metre (3.1/cu yd)) prevents detection by satellite imagery, or even by casual boaters or divers in the area. This is because the patch is a widely dispersed area consisting primarily of suspended "fingernail-sized or smaller"—often microscopic—particles in the upper water column known as microplastics.
Sounds like a fun problem.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pacific_garbage_patch
- mschuster91 2y ago> What has the predicted worth (that is mostly non-liquid) of the top 10 richest people got to do with anything? There used to be a time when rich people did something for the common good with all their (often questionably) gotten money. Even kings had to buy the favor of the commoners, lest they start a riot, and the various variants of mafia are generally known for their generosity in areas where they set up shop. Today's neo-feudalist class has completely forgotten this very basic rule, and people are getting pissed massively. As for why that is related? Well, easy, for someone like Jeff Bezos, funding ocean cleanup or whatever would be not even a tiny dent in his bank accounts...
- bArray 2y ago> Even kings had to buy the favor of the commoners [..] It was literally at the cost of death and the loss of wars. > As for why that is related? Well, easy, for someone like Jeff Bezos, funding ocean cleanup or whatever would be not even a tiny dent in his bank accounts... Are you going to revolt by not using Amazon services and products?