> It’s entirely possible than an LLM will do something that can be defined as “comprehending” something. Agreed, but not even necessary. Each Human uses an ade

> It’s entirely possible than an LLM will do something that can be defined as “comprehending” something. Agreed, but not even necessary. Each Human uses an adequately customized meaning of "comprehending" when they "comprehend" this problem space such that their belief is always "true". This is how Humans are able to produce numerous "true" statements that disagree with each other. If you disagree, just ask one of them and they will "inform" you of the "logic" behind their version. Joking aside though: if Humans are unable to comprehend past a certain level of complexity, I wonder what will happen once AI starts going beyond our abilities, both at the individual level and the culturally conditioned ("the" "reality") level. And, when is this going to really start kicking in?