3 ms·
That would be a prime example of what I called "unconvincing argument" above. Almost every part of your comment is wrong, too, so that certainly cannot be the
by kleiba 2y ago
That would be a prime example of what I called "unconvincing argument" above.
Almost every part of your comment is wrong, too, so that certainly cannot be the reason.
- v3ss0n 2y agoWhy it is wrong? I don't want to learn (((complex))) and (((((((useless (((language)))))))) just to adjust some config. Sorry to trigger you. But that's a fact and I am not wrong about it
- lispm 2y agoObviously you are wrong, since it has been already demonstrated that it's not useless, as already the GNU Emacs example shows. It comes with a lot useful and well written software -> in Emacs Lisp -> roughly 1.5 million lines of code.