3 ms·
Agreed. Gaming is very halo-product driven. AMD has no 4090-killer, so their entire range is always seen as second-best, even for the customers who should be
by hakfoo 2y ago
Agreed. Gaming is very halo-product driven.
AMD has no 4090-killer, so their entire range is always seen as second-best, even for the customers who should be asking "what's the best choice AT MY SPECIFIC BUDGET".
I suspect that's half the reason Intel runs their top-spec SKUs at such absurd wattages-- they've got to own the top slot for the enthusiast-gamers, even if it's a tiny shard of the total market.
I'm sort of intrigued how this will work out for Intel's GPUs long-term. They have no claims of trying to chase the top market, and people were buying the A-series cards in significant part because they were what was available during Covid/Crypto GPU crushes.
- nothercastle 2y agoMaybe but the bulk of cards sold are the *060 series cards. If you have a solid performer that you can bundle in oem systems you have a real winner. But amd absolutely has to compete on price and possibly sell at near a loss to make it happen.