3 ms·
I think this is a very misleading argument. Old growth forests sequester a lot of carbon, which would take new growth literally centuries to match. We don't ha
by g8oz 2y ago
I think this is a very misleading argument. Old growth forests sequester a lot of carbon, which would take new growth literally centuries to match. We don't have centuries.
Clear cutting is not aimed at capturing lumber that would have otherwise fallen into the category of natural modes of tree death. We can and should be smarter about forest management but the industry has learned to speak with a forked tongue and to subborn efforts that would interfere with their short-term mindset that prioritizes maximizing extraction rates.
https://news.mongabay.com/2019/05/tall-and-old-or-dense-and-young-which-kind-of-forest-is-better-for-the-climate/ https://news.mongabay.com/2019/05/tall-and-old-or-dense-and-...