Before I even bother replying, to come back to my original point, the fact that the communists are out in full force to defend the article confirms to me that t

Before I even bother replying, to come back to my original point, the fact that the communists are out in full force to defend the article confirms to me that the point of it is only tangentially related to art and as everything to do with Tito rehabilitation which is nearly as abhorrent to me as actually believing in communism. > USSR was a travesty of communism, it was state capitalism in disguise and some of the leaders of the communist Come on. Even for a teenager, that would be cliché. I don’t really see anything in the rest of your comment which I really want to dignify with a detailed reply. It is an unconvincing answer to a point I never made considering being similar is not being the same. I’m genuinely amazed anyone could qualify the Roman Empire and its diverse history as grandiose however especially someone who fancies themselves communist (or maybe I am not and both actually come from the same lack of critical reading of history - would somehow make sense). I’m definitely not your friend however.