3 ms·
Yes, but here's the problem: most web writing by humans is tepid and bland as well. The reason for it may be different, but the effect the same. Human content-f
by karaterobot 2y ago
Yes, but here's the problem: most web writing by humans is tepid and bland as well. The reason for it may be different, but the effect the same. Human content-fillers get requests to bang out a few content units a day, so they do it. Few if any of these are good. Why would they be, that'd be beside the point. They exist to trick search engines, that's it. A user clicks a search result, and scans the page long enough to realize they've been duped. I'm all for paying writers, which is why I buy books, and subscribe to magazines, substacks, and patreons. But I'm not going to exert myself to protect the unhallowed institution of SEO blogspam production.
- Ylpertnodi 2y ago>Yes, but here's the problem: most [web] writing by humans is tepid and bland as well. The reason for it may be different, but the effect the same. I write at a much lower level than what i did do, cus a) my audience can't seem to comprehend even words like 'comprehend ' and 2) it's not worth getting in trouble at work, where d( apparently i work with 'the finest'.
- lelandfe 2y agoI respect how much this comment had to lean into the errors to avoid it just looking accidental