4 ms·
You miss the point. This isn't about the LLM "falling short" of humanity. It's about observable differences between it and a human. As the author made clear, s
by johnecheck 2y ago
You miss the point. This isn't about the LLM "falling short" of humanity. It's about observable differences between it and a human.
As the author made clear, such a difference is valuable in and of itself because it can be used to detect LLM bots.
- fragmede 2y agowhat they're saying is that a bored human would just sit there and do that, contrary to what the experimenter says, so it can't be used to detect an LLM.