4 ms·
Counterpoint: please don't do any of the above and keep arxiv as it is. It is too valuable to mess it up, it is the few things on the internet that have not bee
by throw_pm23 2y ago
Counterpoint: please don't do any of the above and keep arxiv as it is. It is too valuable to mess it up, it is the few things on the internet that have not been ruined yet, and the "comment activity" can happen in the articles themselves at the scale of years, decades, and centuries.
- Epa095 2y agoThis seems to be a completely different team than arxiv, making a discussion forum on the side. And I prefer this over discussions on 'X'.
- godelski 2y agoI actually want the above, BUT I don't want it to be open to everyone. Not all gate keeping is bad. We don't lack places that the public can engage with researchers and experts. What we do lack are places where researchers/experts can communicate with one another __and expect the other person to be a peer__. The bar to arxiv is (absurdly) low, and I think that's fine. Not everything has to be for everyone. My longer comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484123 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41484123 I'm going to go crazy if I get more GitHub issues asking where the source code is or how to fine tune a model. My research project page is not a Google Search engine nor ChatGPT...
- musicale 2y ago> it is the few things on the internet that have not been ruined yet Hmm, this is an interesting point.