6 ms·
"To be fair" implies there is unfairness. I'd like to better understand who's being shortchanged fairness here. Is it Apple or is it Steve Jobs? In either case,
by alyx 14y ago
"To be fair" implies there is unfairness.
I'd like to better understand who's being shortchanged fairness here. Is it Apple or is it Steve Jobs? In either case, I think protecting the extremely successful, seems like a waste of (argument) energy.
- cleverjake 14y agoIm not really protecting anyone. The author puts forth the idea of Apple having a minimum viable product (just a board), and shipping it because they were once young and scrappy. I counter, saying this was simply par for the course at the time. I don't think he has a valid point. 'To be fair' is being used in more of a colloquialistic sense - a sort of introduction to a counter point.