I was saying censoring LGBT material, not STI prevention literature, might reduce STI transmission rates. I was responding to one speculation, with another, to

I was saying censoring LGBT material, not STI prevention literature, might reduce STI transmission rates. I was responding to one speculation, with another, to show that the parent speculation — that censorship of LGBT information would lead to more death by denying sexually active people in the LGBT community with information on STI prevention drugs — was over simplifying the factors involved, to present their speculation as a matter of fact. If my comment — which I disclosed as mere speculation — is to be censored on those grounds, the parent comment should definitely have been.