4 ms·
I appreciate that, appropriately, the article image is not AI-generated.
by layer8 2y ago
I appreciate that, appropriately, the article image is not AI-generated.
- judge2020 2y agoI was able to get pretty close with chatgpt: https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg https://rr.judge.sh/Commabutterfly/76b34e/nmwguWGt8pIe.jpg > create a picture of scrabble pieces strewn on a table, with a closeup of a line of scrabble letters spelling "CHATGPT" on top of them. photographic, realistic quality, maintain realism and believability
- Daub 2y agoI prefer yours. Better lighting.
- doesnt_know 2y agoThe points on all the tiles are messed up and there are tiles with random squiggles where there should be letters...
- GaggiX 2y agoYou can get much better results with Ideogram 2 (also free): https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/vF81gKjHSA6fYUSxyzzljQ https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/vF81gKjHS... https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/EcRpDLumSAOGdLsCSraBhw https://ideogram.ai/assets/image/lossless/response/EcRpDLumS... Almost the same prompt.
- renewiltord 2y agoGreat tip. The text handling here is far superior.
- vunderba 2y agoYou can also get reasonably close with an open model that you can run locally (flux dev). https://replicate.com/p/xm41nvz05drm00chsywb6am7f0 https://replicate.com/p/xm41nvz05drm00chsywb6am7f0 https://replicate.com/p/kdw8bnkj39rm40chsyzbyg5e04 https://replicate.com/p/kdw8bnkj39rm40chsyzbyg5e04 But of course anyone who has even a passing familiarity with scrabble is going to be able to tell that something's off.
- GaggiX 2y agoThe biggest problem with the default Flux model is that it generates images with that strong AI look, probably caused by the distillation of the CFG. You should try some LoRAs for this, and also prompt the model to generate the rack that holds the letters.
- vunderba 2y agoGood point. I have a comfyui setup for it but its super basic right now just the diffusion model / clip loader / vae. Another thing you've probably noticed is that 99% of images from Flux tend to have that classic narrow depth of field look. I've seen people occasionally be able to get around it with pretty amusing prompt tokens like "instagram photo, selfie, gopro, etc." though.
- layer8 2y agoThe number markings on the Scrabble pieces are nonsensical, the wooden ground looks like plastic, there are strange artifacts like the white smudge on the edge of the “E” tile in the front, and so on. AI-generated images are clearly identifiable as such, and it just gets annoying to continually see those desultory fabrications.
- snakeyjake 2y ago[flagged]
- EnigmaFlare 2y agoIt's silly that there's a stigma attached to AI generated images in cases where it's perfectly reasonable to do. People seem to appreciate things more for the fact that they were created by spending time out of another human's life more than what it actually is.
- layer8 2y agoIt would be silly if they were indistinguishable from human-created images, but they aren't, exhibiting the typical AI artifacts and weirdness, and thereby signal a lack of care/caring.
- EnigmaFlare 2y ago"lack of care" - that's the part about spending time out of another human's life. It's not the poor quality that's the problem but the lack of human effort. Oil paintings are full of visible brush strokes which are an artifact but people love them. For most applications of art - advertising, background decorations, news article pictures, etc. there really is no need to show that humans spent effort on it. The human effort idea is even a bit morally objectionable. You can feel that you're worth more than others because more of the lives of others were consumed to create your possessions. It's a zero sum game where poor people can never afford high-care art because their time is worth less than the artist's.
- __loam 2y agoIt's built on theft and it's a negative quality signal usually.