3 ms·
This article is all over the place. "The first water car is already a reality", but at the same time "Theorised but unproven". What the article claims is that
by roelschroeven 2y ago
This article is all over the place. "The first water car is already a reality", but at the same time "Theorised but unproven".
What the article claims is that the company it talks about can convert water to hydrogen and back to water, and can extract energy from that. That breaks the laws of thermodynamics, yet no claim is made that they have been able to formulate updated laws of thermodynamics consistent with both new and existing observations.
In other words, bullshit.
That "The Diary 24" website seems full of perpetuum mobile and free energy nonsense. How did this get on Hacker News?
- EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK 2y agoWater+KBH4 is converted to hydrogen+KB02. KBH4 is produced off vehicle, at an energy cost that is not mentioned in the article, but no laws of thermodynamics are broken. Bullshitter is you, and I know why.
- roelschroeven 2y agoThe article never mentions KBH4 or KBO2. In fact the article doesn't mention anything that's produced off vehicle. There's only mention of water, hydrogen and oxygen; a unique nano-technology membrane that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen; and a fuel cell that combines hydrogen and oxygen back into water. Of course it's very well possible that the article is leaving out essential facts. Since the article is what we're talking about here, the article is what I'm basing my opinion on. > Bullshitter is you, and I know why. I don't know what you mean. I don't have an agenda here, other than exposing pseudoscience.