> You can always prove the immaterial “I think therefore I am”. But due to the uncertainty of matter, nothing physical can be truly known. But the brain that d

> You can always prove the immaterial “I think therefore I am”. But due to the uncertainty of matter, nothing physical can be truly known. But the brain that does the proving of immaterial is itself material so if matter is uncertain then the reasoning of the proof of immaterial can also be flawed thus you can't prove anything. The only provable thing is that philosophers ask themselves useless questions, think about them long and hard building up convoluted narratives they claim to be proofs, but on the way they assume something stupid to move forward, which eventually leads to bogus "insights".