3 ms·
We're shipping more (by value) OCaml software to end users than probably anyone. To say this is "specialized" is absurd. Also opam doesn't do what we need, sh
by rwmj 2y ago
We're shipping more (by value) OCaml software to end users than probably anyone. To say this is "specialized" is absurd. Also opam doesn't do what we need, showing you don't understand the requirements.
- yawaramin 2y agoGuilty as charged, I don't fully understand your requirements because you haven't specified exactly what they are, you've spoken in fairly abstract terms that seem like they should be achievable by a locked-down opam repository. Of course I'm sure now that you have many other requirements which are not achievable by opam, but when I speak about 'specialized' I am thinking about the vast majority of OCaml development and teams, not the 'value' (which I don't doubt, I am sure you are shipping great OCaml software). For example, avionics systems are developed in a specialized way due to rigorous safety requirements, yet they offer critical global value. They're still specialized requirements though because most software is not developed like that.