4 ms·
Yes and no. For terrorism purposes, the primary (more or less the same as a "Hiroshima"-level "A"-bomb) would surely more than suffice. I'm sort of struggling
by Earw0rm 2y ago
Yes and no. For terrorism purposes, the primary (more or less the same as a "Hiroshima"-level "A"-bomb) would surely more than suffice.
I'm sort of struggling to think why anyone other than a nation state (looking to prove itself worthy of a seat at various tables) would want to possess more bang than that.
Granted there are a few nations at or close to A-bomb tech whom we would definitely not want having its bigger brother. Iran and NK especially.
- 1attice 2y ago"640 kilotons ought to be enough for anyone"
- xattt 2y agoAnd now if you want to run a nuclear program, the minimum amount is at least 16 gigatons.
- tiberious726 2y agoYour users will complain if you don't give them at least 32 gigatonnes