3 ms·
Unless I misunderstood, that's, to put a bit bluntly, just their opinion, no court or government involved?
by Etheryte 2y ago
Unless I misunderstood, that's, to put a bit bluntly, just their opinion, no court or government involved?
- layer8 2y agoUniversity professors specializing in copyright law and AI are involved. It’s a study whose results are being presented to the European Parliament.
- rpdillon 2y agoThe title suggests that AI Training _is_ copyright infringement, but none of the folks talking have the authority to say that. An (increasingly common) case of folks asserting opinions as fact.
- tgsovlerkhgsel 2y agoOpinion pieces at these levels are technically just that, but in practice, they can form the legal consensus. I don't know how common it is, but I have the impression that in at least one jurisdiction I'm aware of, publishing a journal article that argues for an interpretation of the law favorable to your client is an actual legal strategy employed by lawyers (for areas where the law is open to a lot of interpretation/there isn't much precedent yet).
- ranger_danger 2y agoSource? I have serious doubts this actually exists in any meaningful capacity in the world.