> OK, but my question remains: what is it that the author thinks is particularly unusual about this image? This is explained in the blog post: Publications gen

> OK, but my question remains: what is it that the author thinks is particularly unusual about this image? This is explained in the blog post: Publications generally avoid going anywhere near that level of detail, even if not representing actual/accurate data (to avoid the appearance of leaking anything sensitive even if it actually isn't - as the post explains).