Appreciate the added depth around the addition consequences of founder mode. I worry that 'founder mode' will be taken as 'be an a-hole' v2 or something as v1

Appreciate the added depth around the addition consequences of founder mode. I worry that 'founder mode' will be taken as 'be an a-hole' v2 or something as v1 was to mimic the success of Steve Jobs. Being an a-hole was an aspect of Jobs but not the source of his success. Being an a-hole is not itself a gateway or required attribute for success as was the popular takeaway there. Micromanaging, buzzing around, and bypassing structure should not be the takeaway from 'founder mode' or you will have bad leaders excuse those tendencies and chalk it up to being in 'founder mode' after graduating from 'a-hole'.