3 ms·
You’d think they’d use a cheaper hosting service if that’s literally the only thing preventing them from having positive gross profit.
by Laaas 2y ago
You’d think they’d use a cheaper hosting service if that’s literally the only thing preventing them from having positive gross profit.
- fendy3002 2y agohonest questions, is there any ECS-like hosting that's much cheaper?
- re-thc 2y ago> is there any ECS-like hosting that's much cheaper? Most have adopted EKS-like services i.e. kubernetes. There is fly.io that's closer. Hope they improve on the reliability aspect.
- jfdjkfdhjds 2y agofor compute of containerized payloads, in house servers is a no brainer for cost. almos zero sysadmin troubles. might even reduce the troubles of working with eks/ecs. now for storage and db, that's a different story.
- evantbyrne 2y agoDocker Swarm. After building a whole CD PaaS for ECS, I came to believe that swarm is a much more reasonable place for teams to start, so I built a free tool for deploying single-machine swarms called Rove. Do your own research though, and remember you don't have to use one tool or platform for everything.
- happyopossum 2y ago> if that’s literally the only thing preventing them from having positive gross profit It’s clearly not if the founder isn’t taking a salary and they just had to lay off their only employee..