The question you are missing is why an alternative is needed in the first place? Fine, X sucks. Many of us can agree on that. But what problem is it solving tha

The question you are missing is why an alternative is needed in the first place? Fine, X sucks. Many of us can agree on that. But what problem is it solving that would force a a replacement to be created if it simply did not exist? I'm not saying it has no value, nor denying that people find uses for it. I'm saying that without an external problem being solved, building a competitor doesn't answer the original question of... why does this need to exist at all?