These all seem a bit (understandably) vague. > Article 11 – Privacy and personal data protection > Each Party shall adopt or maintain measures to ensure that,

These all seem a bit (understandably) vague. > Article 11 – Privacy and personal data protection > Each Party shall adopt or maintain measures to ensure that, with regard to activities within the > lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems: > a privacy rights of individuals and their personal data are protected, including through > applicable domestic and international laws, standards and frameworks; and > b effective guarantees and safeguards have been put in place for individuals, in accordance > with applicable domestic and international legal obligations I'm glad to see interest in personal privacy. > Article 14 – Remedies > 1 Each Party shall, to the extent remedies are required by its international obligations and > consistent with its domestic legal system, adopt or maintain measures to ensure the availability > of accessible and effective remedies for violations of human rights resulting from the activities > within the lifecycle of artificial intelligence systems. > 2 With the aim of supporting paragraph 1 above, each Party shall adopt or maintain measures > including: > a measures to ensure that relevant information regarding artificial intelligence systems which > have the potential to significantly affect human rights and their relevant usage is > documented, provided to bodies authorised to access that information and, where > appropriate and applicable, made available or communicated to affected persons Does this mean the core instructions must be documented and shared? Good luck with that one. I don't really like treaties, but at least this one seems somewhat innocuous and light on specific demands.