4 ms·
Might depend on what your measure of 'novelty' is in protein structure. A single residue change (for example) would not normally be considered a novel structure
by gilleain 2y ago
Might depend on what your measure of 'novelty' is in protein structure. A single residue change (for example) would not normally be considered a novel structure - it's just a mutation.
However, a new fold - that is, the shape that the backbone folds into - would be novel. Potentially also novel would be 'chimeric' structures with parts from other structures, as with chimeric domain swaps.
There was a structure designed by the Baker lab called 'Top7 - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14631033/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14631033/ that I remember as ground breaking at the time :) (in the ancient days of 2003 it seems ...)
- eig 2y agoExactly. If the proteins suggested in this paper are very similar to known good binders in PDB then I am much less impressed by the results. You could argue they are generating a structure from the training set. I want more info about how novel these proteins are.