4 ms·
You’re correct that logical thinking falls short of proving human-caused global warming in and of itself, but you couple that with empirical evidence. Under all
by dclowd9901 2y ago
You’re correct that logical thinking falls short of proving human-caused global warming in and of itself, but you couple that with empirical evidence. Under all thinking roots logical thinking. Data and research only go so far: At some point, you have to try to take the evidence you have and apply it using logic. Indeed you need logic to even construct the studies in a way that they will yield useful results.
- matrix87 2y ago> Under all thinking roots logical thinking Hmm, is this something that you can prove with logic though?
- dclowd9901 2y agoYou can prove if A = B and B = C, A = C. I understand the example is contrived, but the point is you have a framework for making conclusions. All of the data in the world won’t help you if you can’t arrange its into a way to make a conclusion from it. This is how logic underpins everything. It’s sort of like physics. Everything is just physics at its basis.