3 ms·
I mostly agree for data given. With carve outs for data that is necessary for something. For a silly example, recall back when Amazon was hiding information i
by taeric 2y ago
I mostly agree for data given. With carve outs for data that is necessary for something. For a silly example, recall back when Amazon was hiding information in their emails so that they wouldn't be sharing purchase information with third parties.
It sucks, because I don't necessarily know how you could codify the difference here. If you said that Amazon was sharing customer emails and purchases with a third party, that is indeed suspicious as heck. When you restate that they email you receipts with this information, it sounds a lot different. Indeed, it was very inconvenient when they didn't do that.
This is also why most hospitals have that ridiculous, "you have a new message on the portal" emails. Which are so infuriating.