43 ms·
For what it's worth, Nim allows much more lexical flexibility than Python. You can very often use parens ()s and optional extra parens are not usually a proble
by cb321 2y ago
For what it's worth, Nim allows much more lexical flexibility than Python. You can very often use parens ()s and optional extra parens are not usually a problem either - the bracket is just not spelled {}. As another example, both code & documentation comments have "open-close" forms with #[ and ##[. Also, my hello world's are more like 16K on x64-Linux than 100K. There are also user-defined operators, lisp-like syntax macros but with static typing, etc., etc. Nim is Choice, but not everyone likes that.
- pmarreck 2y agoRoc, Nim and Idris are currently compelling to me. Roc and Idris mainly because I like pure functional languages along with some typing. But I like Nim a lot too. I am on the lookout for a language that I can replace some overly complex Bash scripts with for commandline use.
- cb321 2y agohttps://github.com/c-blake/cligen https://github.com/c-blake/cligen makes whipping up CLI utilities very easy in Nim with a pretty fancy CL-user experience (colorized, user-tunable --help, Zsh/bash completions, brief long options, spellcheck/autosuggest on typos, etc.). As examples, there are like 60+ such utilities over at https://github.com/c-blake/bu https://github.com/c-blake/bu . Unsure all that adds up to "critical mass" for you, but it seemed worth noting.
- pmarreck 2y agoThat is definitely worth noting!! I don’t suppose I could compile a binary that runs on both linux and macos (a la Cosmopolitan)?
- cb321 2y agoI do not have any personal experience with it, but I have heard several success stories for Actually Portable Executables & Nim and there is this to try to ease the path for cosmopolitan libc fans: https://github.com/foxoman/cosmonim/blob/master/README.md https://github.com/foxoman/cosmonim/blob/master/README.md