4 ms·

I love your syntax for joins and unions! A bit puzzled by why the connector slots into the query, instead of the query slotting into the connector, given that

• tilyupo 2y ago
  It was more of an ergonomics choice. To me it seems like it's more readable to write `await users.filter(user => user.id.eq(42).fetch(connector)` instead of `await connector.fetch(users.filter(user => user.id.eq(42))`. But I might be wrong, your idea makes more sense from logical perspective.
  • deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]
  • jgoyvaerts 2y ago
    What about moving the connector to the table declaration, similar to dbcontext in .net? Something like Q.table(definition, connector), which would then allow you to just write users.filter(user => user.id.eq(42).fetch()
  • williamdclt 2y ago
    I’m not sure I can say which is _objectively_ better, but I was also surprised, connector.fetch would be more consistent with common JS practices