That sounds like a fine idea to me. I'm just trying to point out that if it's true, then that bang wasn't the big one. We can have several very large bangs, bu

That sounds like a fine idea to me. I'm just trying to point out that if it's true, then that bang wasn't the big one. We can have several very large bangs, but there can be only one Big Bang™, and nothing comes before it. This is for the same reason that Harry Potter is a wizard, it's not about evidence, it's just defined that way.