3 ms·

I really doubt it has significantly better html5 support than the Android browser, if it's even better at all. But goal posts moving aside, your point was that

I really doubt it has significantly better html5 support than the Android browser, if it's even better at all. But goal posts moving aside, your point was that Safari is somehow evidence that html is important to Apple, when viewed in the context of the entire industry it's above average. Lots of companies are doing good things with html in mobile, even Rim.

cageface 14y ago
Mobile Safari is head & shoulders better than the stock Android browser, which is really a piece of shit. This is abundantly documented all over the web. Just ask the Sencha guys how much fun they've had trying to get acceptable performance out of Android. Judging the companies by the browser they put in front of users, Apple cares more about HTML5 than anybody else. Like I said, if Google can get mobile Chrome out there I'll revise my assessment.
paulirish 14y ago
The difference is enormous between Android Browser and Chrome: http://beta.html5test.com/compare/browser/android40/chromemobile.html http://beta.html5test.com/compare/browser/android40/chromemo... This just captures features, speed is an order of magnitude.
- deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
- MatthewPhillips 14y ago
  We were comparing Mobile Safari to Android. H.264 support is not an HTML5 feature, by the way.