3 ms·
They aren't implied. They are physical documents presented and signed after the 'employment contract' has already began to be executed. Hell that 'employment c
by willcipriano 2y ago
They aren't implied. They are physical documents presented and signed after the 'employment contract' has already began to be executed.
Hell that 'employment contract' is at will 99% of the time, any party can end it at point for any reason, but that doesn't apply to the implied non-compete portion signed after employment? What?
It's nonsense all the way down.
- flanked-evergl 2y agoIf you sign a non-compete clause in the context of employment, even at will employment, the continued employment can serve as consideration for the clause. It's not without consideration. If you sign a non-compete clause outside the context of employment, and there is no consideration for it, i.e. no continued employment or any other consideration, it's without consideration. Good luck with the novel legal theories in court, but I don't think courts are too fond of equivocation.
- willcipriano 2y agoI'm telling you the emperor has no clothes. Either way: Honest people would tell you the terms and conditions like that before asking about your price. Even if it's legal, its dishonest. "Whoops we accidently made as much duress as possible for you to sign our contract that we are just revealing now."