4 ms·

He is abusing the trust people had in the platform before he took it over. Many people believe what they read on there wholesale because it had a decade of semi

He is abusing the trust people had in the platform before he took it over. Many people believe what they read on there wholesale because it had a decade of semi-legitimate journalist and other respected figures participating.

mensetmanusman 2y ago
The people censored for wrong political though before he took over did not trust Twitter…
- bamboozled 2y ago
  What type of "wrong" political thought was censored on Twitter before he bought it? I' really interested to hear about this.
  - mensetmanusman 2y ago
    https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-the-swamp-and-mainstream-media-coordinated-to-censor-americans-free-speech-%EF%BF%BC/ https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-th... This is one example, also conservative satire/humor from the Bee was banned.
    - bamboozled 2y ago
      Former Twitter employees admitted the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story didn’t violate any Twitter policies but it was taken down anyway. They also admitted they made no attempt to verify the authenticity of the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop. The conservative-leaning parody site, The Babylon Bee, was suspended by Twitter for 12 hours, after it had mockingly awarded transgender government official Rachel Levine the title "Man of the Year." Bit hyperbolic ? Anyway, that link you sen is hilarious, Twitter is a private company and platform, they can stop showing useless stories if they want too, there is no law against removing total rubbish from the platform. Twitter also had a right to "free speech". I'd only really any of this as a problem if laws were passed banning discussion about..."the holy laptop". The bee is lame, I'd remove that from my platform too.
      - mensetmanusman 2y ago
        If one didn’t understand the role of satire in human sociology, one would be inclined to remove it from the public square.

mensetmanusman 2y ago

The people censored for wrong political though before he took over did not trust Twitter…

bamboozled 2y ago
What type of "wrong" political thought was censored on Twitter before he bought it? I' really interested to hear about this.
- mensetmanusman 2y ago
  https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-the-swamp-and-mainstream-media-coordinated-to-censor-americans-free-speech-%EF%BF%BC/ https://oversight.house.gov/release/the-cover-up-big-tech-th... This is one example, also conservative satire/humor from the Bee was banned.
  - bamboozled 2y ago
    Former Twitter employees admitted the New York Post’s Hunter Biden laptop story didn’t violate any Twitter policies but it was taken down anyway. They also admitted they made no attempt to verify the authenticity of the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop. The conservative-leaning parody site, The Babylon Bee, was suspended by Twitter for 12 hours, after it had mockingly awarded transgender government official Rachel Levine the title "Man of the Year." Bit hyperbolic ? Anyway, that link you sen is hilarious, Twitter is a private company and platform, they can stop showing useless stories if they want too, there is no law against removing total rubbish from the platform. Twitter also had a right to "free speech". I'd only really any of this as a problem if laws were passed banning discussion about..."the holy laptop". The bee is lame, I'd remove that from my platform too.
    - mensetmanusman 2y ago
      If one didn’t understand the role of satire in human sociology, one would be inclined to remove it from the public square.