3 ms·
8w vs 5w power would make your battery time jump from 12h to 19h. When looked at alone 3w difference is not a lot, but in the context of 8w to 3w, 3w is an impr
by ranguna 2y ago
8w vs 5w power would make your battery time jump from 12h to 19h. When looked at alone 3w difference is not a lot, but in the context of 8w to 3w, 3w is an improvement of around 37% (if I did the math right).
If you optimize the software in such a way that the power draw on idle can be very low, all that work will go to waste if the cpu is clocked at 8w minimum. You need a cpu that supports going to that low wattage.
Taking this as a reference for an arm cpu on a laptop: https://www.anandtech.com/show/17024/apple-m1-max-performance-review/3 https://www.anandtech.com/show/17024/apple-m1-max-performanc...
You can see that even with the laptop on showing a static screen, the power draw is less than 1W. That's crazy and tbh, I'm not sure I believe it myself.
In summary, I do agree with you that we need to optimize our OSs so that they become more efficient, but we also need the hardware to improve. 8w minimum is not nearly enough for good battery life.
- delfinom 2y agoIt's only less than 1W for the CPU, the total consumption is 7.2W at idle because the screen is going to suck power no matter what. Per the table at the end. Existing Intel Meteor Lake CPU in laptops already draw anywhere from 4W to 11W idle (That's CPU + screen in benchmarks). Like these: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-RedmiBook-Pro-16-2024-review-Perhaps-the-best-Meteor-Lake-laptop-with-a-long-battery-life.829901.0.html#c11198005 https://www.notebookcheck.net/Xiaomi-RedmiBook-Pro-16-2024-r...
- ranguna 2y agoIndeed, but a win on the cpu power consumption is a win, regardless if you have other stuff sucking power or not.