3 ms·
I think the whole idea of extra instructions required for LLMs is unnecessary. A decent LLM should be able to handle browsing the site, if needed it can use the
by Tepix 2y ago
I think the whole idea of extra instructions required for LLMs is unnecessary. A decent LLM should be able to handle browsing the site, if needed it can use the sitemap. It can hopefully also figure out what the various sections are about.
- sbergot 2y agoI agree. There are enough standard places to put metadata in a website.
- crimsoneer 2y agoBut why would we waste that many tokens on objects that LLms dont care about? Humans appreciate beauty. LLMs do not. Why are we wasting effort?
- anonzzzies 2y ago> Humans appreciate beauty Some humans do for websites; I personally couldn't care less and I find it often just annoying / in the way. I wish all sites where just black on white or the reverse and with clear interaction elements (including for saas sites). I welcome the near future where I can say; 'show me all important sentry issues, ah yes, make an issue in github to to fix this one and just make the rest resolved' instead of having to click through a myriad of useless and often confusing 'UX' and 'beauty' just to do things. Non saas sites I just visit to read so I immediately ram the reader-mode button which shows the site indeed as I want.
- dotancohen 2y agoI wish that the website would provide the content, and my user agent would provide my preferred styling e.g. fonts, colours, line spacing, etc.
- addandsubtract 2y agoAnyone else remember when websites had sitemaps? I miss those days.
- Tepix 2y agoYou mean sitemaps for humans?
- dotancohen 2y ago> A decent LLM should be able to handle browsing the site A decent web dev would design the site such that it is easy enough to parse for humans, that a machine could do it too.