4 ms·
Freakonomics story. http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/10/04/more-evidence-on-the-lack-of-impact-of-school-choice/ http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/10/04/more-ev
by ramses0 14y ago
Freakonomics story.
http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/10/04/more-evidence-on-the-lack-of-impact-of-school-choice/ http://www.freakonomics.com/2007/10/04/more-evidence-on-the-...
I can't find the exact reference but I believe somewhere in the book they talk about the mere fact of entering your student into this lottery to go to a better school meant that the student would have better outcomes (regardless of whether they "won" the lottery or not).
The idea being that it was the mere "intent" of a parent wanting better for their child that had the most impact on student performance.
- edderly 14y agoYeah, there's a nice summary of some of these types of papers here: http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2007/RAND_WR460.pdf http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2007/RAND_WR460.pdf (section 2.3). Some people wish to extrapolate that lottery results proves that a (statistically) lower quality pupil going to a a good school is without benefit.