3 ms·
The variable n comes out of nowhere in theorem 3.3, and they do not refer to it in the proof itself as far as I can tell. Is this just an editing error (I think
by KvanteKat 2y ago
The variable n comes out of nowhere in theorem 3.3, and they do not refer to it in the proof itself as far as I can tell. Is this just an editing error (I think the formula 3.4 needs the variable n if f is multidimensional and we are integrating over R^n, but since f is in L^1(R) I'm not sure what it signifies. I am however worried that there's something I'm missing).
- eigenket 2y agoYeah it's an editing error. Looks like originally they wrote the theorem down for R^n and later decided to just stick to R.