2 ms·

I'd say 1/3rd is a rather large chunk of an SSDs TBW if its just for hibernating. In practice, for reasons you outlined, it would be a smaller amount but I woul

• redundantly 2y ago
  Chances are, the computer will break or be replaced in five years or less. It doesn’t really matter if you reach 2%, 33%, or even 90% of the TBW if the system or component is replaced before it uses up all its writes.
  • consteval 2y ago
    > Chances are, the computer will break or be replaced in five years or less. I think this is less and less true as time goes on. I have a laptop from 5 ish years ago I still use and it's actually pretty fast. And, even so, it's not like the ONLY wear on your SSD is the hibernation. So this 5 year figure, I'm not sure it's right. I think, maybe if you're someone who stresses your hard drives a lot (maybe you work with photography or videography?) hibernation might make an impactful difference.
    • redundantly 2y ago
      The five-year estimate is based solely on hibernation writes, which is a very conservative figure. In reality, most users will use closer to 2% of the TBW for hibernation, not 33%. For those with heavy I/O workloads, they likely have higher-grade or larger SSDs with a higher TBW rating. Additionally, TBW isn’t a hard limit and can often be exceeded, with some drives lasting beyond 200%. For most users, TBW won’t be an issue, and other components are more likely to fail before the drive wears out.
  • mintplant 2y ago
    My previous ThinkPad lasted eight years before I replaced it with this one.