This is pointless in the long run. For now, there's still plenty of people who just simply ask ChatGPT a question straight up and copy-paste the output. In such

This is pointless in the long run. For now, there's still plenty of people who just simply ask ChatGPT a question straight up and copy-paste the output. In such cases, it's doable to catch a lot of them with very few false positives. But at some point this will become common knowledge, and then the norm will be using LLM services that generate content that is not recognizable as AI-generated, rendering this policy as useful as one that requires posters to wear red socks while posting. A trend I've been noticing is that there's people who actually have something useful to add or ask, but for some reason, possibly being scared of downvotes, still use GPT to rewrite their stuff. Maybe the community is to intimidating, maybe they don't know how to phrase stuff properly, but I've seen it multiple times. This inspired me to develop SoundNatty[1] that shows the long-term fruitlessness of policies like these, by rewriting content to sound natural to a target audience. I'm not offering an API because I hate bot spam as much as anyone else, but honestly it's only a matter of time before someone else does. [1] https://soundnatty.com https://soundnatty.com