4 ms·
> Folks with superficial knowledge in one of these areas are not encouraged to apply. Is this really necessary to call out? Why discourage candidates from appl
by ghostpepper 2y ago
> Folks with superficial knowledge in one of these areas are not encouraged to apply.
Is this really necessary to call out? Why discourage candidates from applying?
- 082349872349872 2y agoI'd guess that in the past, they've had far too many "candidates" who weren't candidates.
- ghostpepper 2y agoNobody who meets that definition of "superficial" will self-select out of the process after reading that. Good candidates may, however.
- kristopolous 2y agoright. for high performing competent people who don't need to work, the top reason they'd bounce is if you come across like a bunch of jerks.
- melenaboija 2y agoTo me this sounds pedantic, a good argument for a discretionary recruiting process and a good indicator of a bad interview/work experience. Why don't they instead try to define what superficial means? What do they expect from candidates in a way that can be measured? How many years of professional/research experience?