3 ms·
I think your point is that packages should be removed only if they stop working, with which I agree.
by wrp 2y ago
I think your point is that packages should be removed only if they stop working, with which I agree.
- papascrubs 2y agoI think there's probably a good middle ground that could be found. Maybe an "unmaintained" repo that can be activated or called ala backports. I definitely don't think things should be fully removed if working. But some sort of indicator or opt-in based on the status makes sense. "Here be dragons"