> Are we already conceding that LLMs are people? I bet that trying to blur the line is part of the AI startup propaganda strategy. There's no reason to think

> Are we already conceding that LLMs are people? I bet that trying to blur the line is part of the AI startup propaganda strategy. There's no reason to think the legal rights enjoyed by people transfer to machines by analogy. My car can't be party to a contract because I can, just like the fact that I can learn doesn't mean any content can be loaded into a retrieval system [1]. [1] No, redefining the term "learning" to include "performing certain calculations on a computer" does not make those calculations the same as human learning.