Personally I just go with the scientific method. That means coming up with falsifiable hypotheses and deducing predictions from them logically, then comparing t

Personally I just go with the scientific method. That means coming up with falsifiable hypotheses and deducing predictions from them logically, then comparing to reality in order to accept and continue, or reject and rethink the approach and situation. Unfortunately I think most people won’t want to do this, because who wants to draw a target on themselves „he was wrong about that“ and risk job security, because coworkers make themselves look flawless by saying/doing things in a vague rather than falsifiable way.