3 ms·
>Babies conceived through IVF already have identical outcomes to naturally conceived babies. Except for the dozens of fetuses that are not brought to term and
by sickofparadox 2y ago
>Babies conceived through IVF already have identical outcomes to naturally conceived babies.
Except for the dozens of fetuses that are not brought to term and flushed because they would not survive to birth.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> Except for the dozens of fetuses that are not brought to term and flushed because they would not survive to birth One, zygote or blastocyst; it's not technically even an embryo until the amniotic sac develops [1]. Definitely not a fetus. Two, "at least 40% of [natural] human pregnancies are lost before implantation" [2]. With assisted reproduction, that's 75% [3]. But "total loss from fertilisation to birth is 40-60%" in natural births [4]. About 65% to 80% of IVF implanted embryos result in a live birth [5], or about a total loss of 80%. (And improving.) When ART results in a lower total loss from fertilisation to birth than natural conception, would you argue for banning the latter? [1] https://www.medicinenet.com/embryo_vs_fetus_differences_week-by-week/article.htm https://www.medicinenet.com/embryo_vs_fetus_differences_week... [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6053685/ [3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670474/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7670474/ [3] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306416/ [4] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306416/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5306416/ [5] https://www.pfcla.com/blog/frozen-embryo-transfer-success-rates-ivf https://www.pfcla.com/blog/frozen-embryo-transfer-success-ra...