3 ms·
> Is that really so? As the article notes, no, this is not a correct description.
by pdonis 2y ago
> Is that really so?
As the article notes, no, this is not a correct description.
- sieste 2y agosorry for the confusion, I meant is it really the case that this is a commonly used description of the higgs field.
- pdonis 2y ago> is it really the case that this is a commonly used description of the higgs field. For whatever it's worth, it's not a description I had seen before I read the article. It's certainly not one you're going to find in actual textbooks or physics papers.