4 ms·
I would argue that if what the employer expects to be done in 40 hours can be done in 20 by a skilled employee, then it’s not exactly the employee’s job to tell
by BriggyDwiggs42 2y ago
I would argue that if what the employer expects to be done in 40 hours can be done in 20 by a skilled employee, then it’s not exactly the employee’s job to tell them to allocate more work on his/her plate for the same amount of pay. That business needs to do a better job of understanding the work they need done. This, of course, won’t apply to a job like a call center or something where the time on the job is itself the labor being done, only in cases where the output is measurable. But in those cases, the employer’s feeling cheated by not being able to waste the time of/underpay that skilled employee doesn’t exactly sadden me.
- WalterBright 2y agoAgain, it is rarely possible to quantify the productivity of a programmer. That's why we pay them according to how many hours they work. Contracting for 40 hours but only delivering 20 is fraudulent.
- BriggyDwiggs42 2y agoI’ll put it this way: if I feel like I’ve given you 40 hours of work in 20 hours, I’m going to lie to you and go do something else unless I enjoy my job, and I don’t feel like that’s morally wrong unless I’m incorrect about my output.