3 ms·

Off the top of my head - a large vehicle license, which comes with increased taxes or fees or something. Businesses that require those vehicles can pay it. And

Off the top of my head - a large vehicle license, which comes with increased taxes or fees or something. Businesses that require those vehicles can pay it. And maybe we can even have waivers or something for small businesses, or non-profits, or households with 4+ kids.

AnthonyMouse 2y ago
> Businesses that require those vehicles can pay it. This is not distinguishing between them at all, it's just adding a new tax that makes everything cost more. > And maybe we can even have waivers or something for small businesses, or non-profits, or households with 4+ kids. At which point everyone claims to be a small business. Also, if someone has one child rather than four, that doesn't mean they aren't regularly transporting that child's entire sports/drama/music group to events.
- consteval 2y ago
  > it's just adding a new tax that makes everything cost more. Yeah, this is how you discourage people. The license on top is super inconvenient too. I mean, who wants to go to the DMV and take a special test just for their ego booster? > At which point everyone claims to be a small business I imagine you have hard requirements, it's not like anyone can just say so. > Also, if someone has one child rather than four, that doesn't mean they aren't regularly transporting that child's entire sports/drama/music group to events. Okay. But are they? Because the situation we're in right now, currently, that we're trying to solve is that the average number of passengers in a vehicle is 1.5 and the majority of vehicles are SUVs and trucks. I don't know, I guess those people can just pay the tax. Or, better yet, don't buy a vehicle to optimize for 1% of your driving time. If this discourages car pooling, I say "meh". Car pooling is already basically not a thing, and pretty much all trucks can only hold 5 people. You know... the same amount of people as a compact sedan.

AnthonyMouse 2y ago

> Businesses that require those vehicles can pay it. This is not distinguishing between them at all, it's just adding a new tax that makes everything cost more. > And maybe we can even have waivers or something for small businesses, or non-profits, or households with 4+ kids. At which point everyone claims to be a small business. Also, if someone has one child rather than four, that doesn't mean they aren't regularly transporting that child's entire sports/drama/music group to events.

consteval 2y ago
> it's just adding a new tax that makes everything cost more. Yeah, this is how you discourage people. The license on top is super inconvenient too. I mean, who wants to go to the DMV and take a special test just for their ego booster? > At which point everyone claims to be a small business I imagine you have hard requirements, it's not like anyone can just say so. > Also, if someone has one child rather than four, that doesn't mean they aren't regularly transporting that child's entire sports/drama/music group to events. Okay. But are they? Because the situation we're in right now, currently, that we're trying to solve is that the average number of passengers in a vehicle is 1.5 and the majority of vehicles are SUVs and trucks. I don't know, I guess those people can just pay the tax. Or, better yet, don't buy a vehicle to optimize for 1% of your driving time. If this discourages car pooling, I say "meh". Car pooling is already basically not a thing, and pretty much all trucks can only hold 5 people. You know... the same amount of people as a compact sedan.