2 ms·
the article focuses on the next part of that sentence > secondly because the expected value of the game (assuming Ballmer chooses randomly) is negative: you e
by cwmma 2y ago
the article focuses on the next part of that sentence
> secondly because the expected value of the game (assuming Ballmer chooses randomly) is negative: you end up paying Ballmer
- toolz 2y agoand given that the first rule still holds where he chooses hard numbers, then the expected value of the game is negative (aside from meta-gaming this, which is out of scope for a technical problem)